The shareholders, seeking board seats, want the digital music
service to turn around its stock slump or pursue a sale.
Napster Inc. has struggled to catch the ear of enough customers.
Now the company is out of tune with some of its big
shareholders.
With its stock trading at $1.34 and subscribers leaving its digital
music service, the Los Angeles company is facing a proxy battle
with three investors who together own about 1.5% of the company.
They each want a seat on the board and are pushing Napster's
management to turn around its stock slump or pursue a sale.
The company, which bought its name from the defunct file-sharing
network, said Friday that it was continuing to look for suitors
through UBS Investment Bank. But its executives are fighting back,
dismissing the three shareholders as a musician, an ice cream
franchisee and a middle-management banker who are unqualified to
run a digital music business.
The dissident group has put forth "no substantive plan for how its
nominees will enhance value for our stockholders if elected,"
Napster said in a letter to shareholders Friday.
The three shareholders are attacking in advance of the Sept. 18
annual meeting.
In its current incarnation, Napster has been a high-profile
example of the challenges faced in finding a winning business model
in the uncertain world of digital music, which Apple Inc. dominates
with its iTunes store.
Napster has begun several initiatives, including a download store
to complement its subscription service. The efforts have done
little to lift the stock, which is down 31% this year, but
executives say they are poised for a comeback.
"The fundamental strategy is absolutely, unequivocally unchanged
from Day 1," Chris Gorog, Napster's chairman and chief executive,
said in an interview. "Unlimited access to the world's music
catalog any time, anywhere. That's been our vision, our mantra.
Everything else along the way are milestones toward achieving
that."
Napster was the name of a free music-sharing service used by more
than 60 million people before lawsuits filed by the recording
industry shut it down. From the ashes of the 2002 bankruptcy
filing, Napster's name, its kitten-face logo and some of its
technology were acquired by Roxio Inc., a CD-burning-software firm.
Roxio adopted the name in 2004.
The new Napster Inc. created a music subscription service and now
has more than 700,000 subscribers paying $13 a month to listen to a
library of more than 6 million songs. It has a free music streaming
service called FreeNapster, which is ad-supported. And it opened
its digital music store, which sells songs without copyright
protection, in May.
Napster has also pushed to be the mobile music service on
cellphones worldwide. Its U.S. carrier partner is AT&T
Inc.
Despite being an innovator in a burgeoning field, the 145-employee
company has struggled. It recently posted a quarterly loss and said
its subscriber base shrank to 703,000 from 760,000. Revenue fell 6%
to $30.3 million.
Adding to its challenges, Napster has another competitor in the
music subscription space -- Rhapsody America, a joint venture of
RealNetworks Inc. and Viacom Inc.'s MTV Networks. It boasts nearly
3 million subscribers, opened its own music retail store in June
and recently announced a mobile service deal with Verizon
Communications Inc.
Napster's "confidence in the mobile initiative has led them to
continue on a do-it-ourselves strategy," said Michael Olson, a
senior research analyst with Piper Jaffray. "That's the one
glimmering sign of hope. The subscription music model has hit a
brick wall."
In its letter to shareholders, Napster called the three dissidents
inexperienced with the digital music business and public
boards.
Leading the fight are Perry Rod, a professional investor based in
Encino who has sung in a band in the Los Angeles area; Tom Sailors,
a Dallas investor and former manager at Banc of America Securities;
and Kavan Singh, a St. Louis healthcare entrepreneur who also owns
and operates 10 Cold Stone Creamery franchises in California and
Michigan.
"Napster has been going on a road to nowhere," Rod said in an
interview. "It's certainly no surprise that the current board and
management are defending themselves so vigorously. They are
defending their entrenched positions."
The board members whose seats are up for election are Richard
Boyko, a former senior executive at advertising firm Ogilvy &
Mather; Philip Holthouse, a partner at an accounting firm; and
Robert Rodin, a management consultant.
Gorog, who was CEO of Roxio when it acquired the Napster assets,
said he would encourage shareholders to study the current board
members' biographies and expertise. But he said he was sympathetic
to shareholder concerns.
"We understand their frustrations," he said. "It makes us more
committed to increasing the share price."
By Michelle Quinn, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 30, 2008