If this is accurate, I would
be disappointed - i.e. NOK only paying ~2.5B Euro for
Wireless
Credit Suisse’s Achal Sultania, who
has Outperform ratings on both Nokia and Alcatel, issued a note
late yesterday, before Nokia’s statement, based on the
Bloomberg speculation that Nokia might want just the wireless
assets, not the whole of Alcatel.He sees good reason for Nokia to
want those wireless assets.Acquisition of ALU’s Wireless
business may make strategic sense for NOK in our view. We believe
that such a potential deal would allow Nokia to significantly
improve its presence in the US with AT&T and Verizon (where
Ericsson and ALU are key suppliers), with Nokia’s current
customers being T-Mobile and more recently Sprint (starting from
mid-2014). In addition, it may also propel Nokia from distant #3
player in Wireless RAN globally (at ~15% share) to #2 player behind
Ericsson, which enjoys ~35% share (followed by Huawei at 20-25%
share, ALU and ZTE at ~10% each). Ending 2014, Nokia already had
gross/net cash of Eu7.7bn/Eu5.0bn with another Eu750mn likely to
come from converts issued in 2011 (likely conversion later this
year). In addition, we believe that Nokia’s Maps business is
worth around Eu2.4bn (on 2.0x EV/sales) if that asset were to be
divested.Sultania offers his back-of-the envelope on what Nokia
should pay just for the wireless assets:How much should NOK pay for
ALU’s Wireless? We think Eu2bn to Eu2.5bn. For 2016, we
assume Nokia Networks’ revenues at Eu12.0bn with 11.5% OMs,
and we value Networks at 1.2x EV/sales implying Eu14.4bn in our
SOTP analysis (Figure 1). ALU’s Wireless had sales of Eu4.7bn
in 2014 (we estimate with 4% OM loss), and we assume
Eu4.8bn/Eu4.5bn of sales for 2015/2016 with 0%/1% OM profits
(driven by ongoing restructuring efforts). Assuming this deal were
to happen, this would imply Nokia Networks + ALU’s Wireless
entity would deliver sales of Eu16.4bn in 2016 with 9% OMs.
However, we would argue that a scenario exists that NOK can drive
5% OMs in ALU’s Wireless given synergies around R&D. This
would allow combined entity to do sales of Eu16.5bn with 10% OMs,
which at 1.0x EV/sales would imply valuation of Eu16.5bn (an
increase of Eu2.1bn vs. our existing scenario, Figure 2). In
addition, we also believe that Nokia may have to spend Eu250mn on
cash restructuring and Eu500mn on swap out of some of ALU’s
installed base due to differing technology standards. As such, we
believe that Nokia should be willing to pay in the range of Eu2bn
to Eu2.5bn for ALU’s Wireless assets (implying 0.45x to 0.55x
EV/sales for 2016).
|
|