During Linda Thomsen's tenure as head of the enforcement
division of the SEC, Harry Markopolis, a former investment
officer with Rampart Investment Management in Boston, was writing a
series of persuasive letters to the SEC informing them of the
statistical impossibility of Bernie Madoff’s investment
returns. Despite being intimidated by the SEC's
connections to Madoff he persisted, but to no avail:
"My experiences with other SEC
officials proved to be a systemic disappointment and lead me to
conclude that the SEC securities' lawyers, if only through their
investigative ineptitude and financial illiteracy, colluded to
maintain large frauds such as the one to which Madoff later
confessed."
Gary Agguire, a former SEC investigator who spoke to Congress a
few years earlier, claimed he was fired for investigating a hedge
fund too aggressively and said in a series of interviews, like the
one below to the Guardian, that the SEC was in bed with Wall
Street’s powerful players:
"What you have at the SEC is people
rotating from jobs where you make $180,000 a year into jobs where
you make over a million. It's very friendly -
it's a club. I'm here, I'm inside, now I'm outside, now I'm inside
again. When the SEC starts playing favorites and
they decide not to go after Wall Street elite and focus on small
fry, then they're not focusing on the players that really impact
the capital markets. It's not the penny stock dealers that could
trigger a credit crisis in this country."
So it should be no surprise to learn today that Linda Thomsen,
who headed the enforcement division of the Securities and Exchange
Commission during a time in which it oversaw a market meltdown and
failed to catch Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, is apparently
having no job security issues at all. According to Legal
Times, Davis Polk & Wardwell’s Washington office is
adding her as yet another lawyer to its bench of former SEC
officials.
Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock was at “a loss for
words,” over the recent hiring, according to a blog entry at
DeepCapture.com. Though, he still had enough
words to criticize Thomson and the situation:
That would be the same Linda Thomsen
against whom the SEC’s Office of the Inspector General
recommended
disciplanary action for her role in hanging out to dry SEC
Senior Investigator Gary Aguirre, due to his impertinence in
subpoenaing Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack, a Wall Streeter
“with
juice” (in the words of Aguirre’s boss), just
because a trail of clues in “the
most important insider trading case in 30 years” led
directly
to him.
That would be the same Enforcement
Director to whom a recent report of the SEC’s own Office of
the Inspector General was obliquely referring, in page after page,
for
55 pages, in a report explaining how three well-organized
6th graders could have handled the nation’s naked shorting
complaints better than did the SEC’s Enforcement
Division.
That Linda Thomsen is the
same one whose resumption of employment with white-shoe law firm
Davis Polk & Wardwell (I say “resumption” because
Ms. Thomsen worked at Davis Polk until she joined the SEC in 1995)
was announced today in this gem (”SEC
Enforcement Chief Joins Davis Polk“) from the Blog of
Legal Times (”Law and Lobbying in the Nation’s
Capital”).
The announcement reads, with no
detectable irony:
Linda Thomsen, who headed the
SEC’s enforcement division until February, is starting as a
partner in the firm’s white-collar defense and government
investigations and enforcement practices in June. She will be
joining former SEC commissioner Annette Nazareth, who started at
Davis Polk last year, and Robert Colby, who joined the D.C. office
this year after serving as deputy director of the SEC’s
trading and markets division…
Thomsen practiced in Davis
Polk’s New York office before joining the SEC in 1995. She
started at the commission as assistant chief litigation counsel and
went on to become head of enforcement in 2005. After leaving the
SEC earlier this year, Thomsen says, “I had no preconceived
ideas about where I was going to go, or what I was going to
do.” - Translation: “I swear, it never
occurred to me to go work for the law firm defending wealthy
clients against whom I was overseeing cases until weeks
ago.”
At the firm, Thomsen will advise
clients on internal investigations and defend them against SEC
probes. - Comment: Probes such as those ones she was
overseeing weeks ago.
After serving at the agency for
14 years, Thomsen says she understands the kind of questions
clients should be asking themselves to stay out of trouble with the
commission. “I think I know and can see the kind of issues
that get people into trouble, and the kinds of processes that cause
them to, perhaps, ignore warning signs,” says Thomsen. -
Comment: Yes, I am sure Ms. Thomsen is one of the
world’s most recognized experts on the subject of processes
that cause people to ignore warning signs.
[The comments in bold are from
Patrick Byrne.]
If events in the recent past are any indication, Thomsen will
likely quietly move onto her new job and the majority of the
financial press will ignore this latest development. But it
leaves a humble investor to wonder, is there no shame on Wall
Street? Is our culture so deprived of valuing anything above
the color of money that even our government officials, our
financial journalists and our financial analysts are all, in a
sense, colluding a strange and sort of religious respect for
anybody or anything that has power and may possibly help them reach
the promised land of wealth, by any means?
It is, perhaps, easy to criticise old ways of thinking, filled
with shame and guilt over silly ancient myths and
superstitions. But if a society is filled with people that
have no shame or guilt at all, perhaps it breeds the reporter who
stands in awe of a bank CEO, a regulator who trembles at the feet
of a hedge fund manager.
But in the end it's probably simpler than that. Some
psychologists say that one becomes what and who they surround
themselves with, and in a world focused on money and profit, it is
perhaps inevitable that the regulators and reporters will look up
with respect at those they ought to detest.