OT - Trump and
market
<p>I really don't get it. I expected the market to open a
fair amount lower in reaction to President Jackass calling the
usefulness of NATO outdated, dissing the EU, and targeting PM
Merkle all in one day. NATO and the EU - many commentaters who are
definitive i.e., those that have worked with those organizations as
US representatives have said on the news the terrible
misinformation Trump was spewing, and why NATO and the EU (he also
dissed England and Brexit) are, and have been critical to our
relations with Europe. When it's so evident that he doesn't know
what he's talking about, the market gives him a 'pass'? So then,
what will it take to roil the markets, given that there's a lot
more of this to come.</p> <p>I'm still interested if
anybody has an opinion on whether this market is overpriced. STX
looks interesting with a $6+ dividend, altho that sector that
includes mechanical drive makers hasn't faired well of
late.</p> <p>And for givethe fogginess of memory - on
of the big telecoms I think it was, announced aignificantly large
buildout plans that would require a ton of single cell equipment.
Jon (or Jon and I) had a discussion about Cavium, who makes those
devices. They've certainly had a wide hi-low year, but I do wonder
whether why they make is going to become de rigeur components for
such plans.</p> <p>I am still mulling CSCO. Not that
far away from 52 week highs, which stays my hand, for the
moment.</p>
|
|
The market is way over-priced imo. Most agreed the same a couple
of months ago, and since then it's up another 6% with 2017 earnings
estimates unchanged. It looks like the usual pre-market bump today
will offset the drop yesterday from all the dire headlines about
Trump's off the cuff remarks and uncertainty, and hard Brexit, and
increasing tensions with China and Germany, and possible eviction
of the free press from the White House, so apparently nothing
matters!
I recall too the narrative of the last couple of months was that
everything was awesome. The consumer confidence was awesome, the
holiday season was awesome, individual earnings were awesome, etc.
etc. And yet Target today reported softer than expected comp sales
and lowered their FY guidance too.
finance.yahoo.com/ne...4.html
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/18/17 at 8:19 AM CST
|
|
Since 2012, S&P up 70%, earnings up 2%.
|
Author:
|
Jester
Debunker
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/18/17 at 7:35 PM CST
|
|
Jester,
That's a pretty sobering chart, given the disconnect. Still, the
reason I often state that I used to be good trading the market,
that stopped around 2009 or so when QE was put into effect, and
distorted things beyond my ability to connect cause and effect. Or,
put another way - somehow (well, it's been the fed, as well as
fiscal policy) they've been able to
do this high -wire act that keeps the stock market disconnected
from underlying realities - hence, as we all have said, the further
enrichment of the 1% while the
poorer you are, the less good things have been for you,
financially, job-wise, etc. Probably showed up to a noticeable
degree in white lower class folks abandoning
the Democratic party.
Printing worthless $, doubling+ the debt, no discernable
terrible predicted consequences (the govt figures of employment,
wage increases are all positive,alto we
know them to be often maniputedl) so far. As with everything
else, how long do the plates stop spinning? Or is the can so
durable that it can just get kicked
down the road forever. I believe the US is still seen as the
'safest haven' for investments. My idea of Trump's effect may be
the real beginning of the economic decling of the West, and the
shift of economic axis being China. When the dollar stops being the
reserve currency of the world, I figure we're pretty much cooked.
But I've been wrong on so many things, I proablby would question my
own judgement.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/18/17 at 8:52 PM CST
|
|
That chart should raise huge concerns in the minds of
investors, yet it is "party like it's 1999". Then there is
the new guy in town taking over tomorrow. That combination of
a very expensive stock market and a loose cannon in charge could
make for a very volatile market. It seems surreal,
doesn’t it?
I have had my 401K mostly in a guaranteed fund, I would
not mind a 15% correction.
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/19/17 at 7:06 AM CST
|
|
lt cap,
When I think about it, except for the 'salad days' in the early
2000's when there was money to be made in the vg sector, esp. if
one could read all the analytics (and a lot of people on the 'old'
thread where we 'lived' could do very well), we've been a pretty
dystopian group, believing that the sh*t will hit the fan - and
probably sooner rather than later. That's why I pretty much don't
trust my own judgment anymore, as the market seems to me somewhat
like 'legal land' (if you've had dealings with lawyers, you know
what I mean), where everything is counter intuitive, and defies
common sense and comprehension. Perhaps Trump just may do it - if
something has to burst the bubble of virtual monetary reality, he's
got the inside track. (I continue to be alarmed by the fact that
he's ready to pick a fight wherever he possibly can - I will waive
the explanation of that psychology - but it ain't good.) If Trump's
'reign' produces prosperity and financial well being for us all, I
will firmly believe that we are in la-la land, and it's a great
place to be.
What can save us? (Ridiculous 'slap-back' by CNN featuring a
story about how the Dems could stay in power if Trump and Pence
were assassinated at the same time.( Man, did they take seriously
Trump's shutting down their reporter at that press conferences or
what?)
The 'best' thing is certanly a shot in the dark: We are living
in a virtual reality. If they take us off our 'matrix machines', we
will 'awake' to find that our president is wise and fair. That we
are living in a true democracy, and campaign contributions have
been outlawed, punishable by death. That all people - of class, of
color, of beliefs will be treated with respect. That wealth is
spread among all the people, if they are willing to work, excepting
for those who physically or mentally cannot. That the fed is
abolished. And the worst that can happen is that Santa can take a
dump under my Christmas tree. But he cleans up after himself.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/19/17 at 5:04 PM CST
|
|
|
Author:
|
LongTerm
CapGains
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/20/17 at 7:24 AM CST
|
|
lt cap,
Interesting article - thanks for posting it. Clear opinion,
based on PE vs. traditional valuation. And I would sign onto that -
except that most every logical argument has been confounded for
years now. So, as I've said before - what *should* be according to
stat analysis, simply hasn't occurred since the 2008 crash. Krugman
of the NY Times never stops gloating that his view of economic
stimuluous was a great idea seems to have worked. Yes, my gut says
I ought to put a lot of money on the sidelines. Will I? I'm unsure
about that. As I said the other day, the market has been
counter-intuitive for a long time. (Look at the prices of dividend
rich oil stocks.) Also- I'm a little leery of Ned...(forgot
the last part of the name - Davis?) analysis. Their track record on
stock analysis/recommendations isn't terribly accurate.
Watched Trump's inaugural speech. Now *that's* a powerful
argument to abandon the market. True to form, it was all about
'winning'. Coperation with other countries was rarely noted. That
apparently isn't part of his lexicon. So, if he carries this out,
and why wouldn't he - trade wars are in the offing, economic and
military cooperation with traditional allies turns into 'America
First' competition, and his goal (stated in the inaugural address,
applying also to the above) and his style becomes an agressive one
of competition, and Putin can watch it all unravel. Supposedly,
he's a Republican, and the Republicans control everything right
now. Paul Ryan, behind him and to his right in Trump's auguration
speech, had a broad smile of victory on his face. Except Trump
isn't really a Republican - he's the 'Trump party' beholden
to no one. Ryan may be just another pol who is headed for
Trump's guillotine (sp?), much like the French revolution in the
late 1700's. God help us. And God help the market, given that we
are all invested to different degrees.
|
Author:
|
Jam
ok
|
Subject:
|
Off Topic
|
Sentiment:
|
Neutral
|
Date:
|
01/20/17 at 12:47 PM CST
|
|