The last paragraph of this article encapsulates my own thoughts
on the Chinese government as it regards its huge companies,
including Alibaba, Tencent, JD and PDD
Alibaba Stock Is Under Fire. This Options Play Bets It Will
Recover.
By Steven M. Sears Dec.
31, 2020 6:00 am ET
- Order Reprints
- Print Article
Text size Alibaba
founder Jack Ma.
Philippe Lopez/AFP via Getty Images
Of all the troubles in the world, be glad you don’t have
Jack Ma’s woes to contend with.
The billionaire founder of Alibaba Group
Holding (ticker: BABA) has angered one of the
world’s most powerful people, Xi Jinping, the leader of
China. It is unclear how the story will end, or what ultimately
happens to Alibaba.
For whatever reason—and there isn’t any good
one—Ma gave a speech with critical comments about
China’s financial regulations interfering with technological
innovations. Xi quickly reminded China’s richest man to be
mindful of his place.
Shortly thereafter, Xi reportedly blocked the initial public offering of Ant Financial
Group, of which Alibaba owns a third, and put Alibaba under antitrust review for
monopolistic business practices. Regulators are concerned that Ant
is originating consumer loans and selling them to banks, without
making financial accommodations to reflect risk. It has been
suggested that Ant return to its origins as a payments network.
Alibaba has come under more intense scrutiny. The government is
suddenly concerned that Alibaba, which owns many different but
related companies, could be a monopoly.
Investors are panicked. Since late October, Alibaba’s
stock has declined some 34%, dramatically underperforming Chinese
stock proxies like the Xtrackers Harvest
CSI 300 China A-Shares exchange-traded fund (ASHR)
and the iShares China
Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The selloff is one of the
worst since Alibaba’s September 2014 stock offering.
One of the greatest fears most investors have about China is
that the laws are unreliable. Nevertheless, Alibaba remains one of
the most singular—if now controversial—ways to
play the rise of China’s middle class, which
is one of the world’s most profound economic events.
With Alibaba’s stock around $238, investors can sell the
January $230 put option for $5.25 and sell the January $260 call
option for $1.75. This so-called short strangle—that
is, selling a put and call with different
strike prices but the same expiration—pays investors for
agreeing to buy Alibaba stock at an effective price of $223 (a $230
strike minus a $7 options premium) and to sell stock at an
effective price of $267.
During the past 52 weeks, Alibaba has ranged from $169.95 to
$319.32. The stock is up about 12% in 2020.
The risk to selling a strangle is high. The stock could plummet
far below the put strike price if regulators decide to dismantle
the company and disenfranchise investors, for example. The stock
could surge, too, but it’s very difficult to characterize
Alibaba’s path as anything but uncertain.
Alibaba’s stock, once universally admired as evidence of
China’s technological and investment prowess, is trading
under a cloud of unquantifiable uncertainty because Ma seemingly
forgot his place in his country’s power structure.
If these regulatory reviews occurred anywhere but in China,
investors would criticize Ma for speaking too freely and harming
his business.
But most Western investors are scared that China ultimately
threatens America’s global leadership. Alibaba has thus
ceased—temporarily or permanently—to exist as an
example of China’s technological might and innovation.
Alibaba now trades under a cloud of uncertainty because the Chinese
Communist Party has unlimited power.
Our suggested investment approach expresses a perhaps
out-of-consensus view that Alibaba, to play off an old Chinese
saying, isn’t the proverbial chicken about to be killed to
scare the monkey.
Xi may discipline and humiliate Ma, but Xi is unlikely to
seriously impede the flow of international money and domestic
technology that Xi needs for China to continue its incredible
economic rise.
Email: editors@barrons.com